Bowman and Brooke Logo

PRACTICES & INDUSTRIES

While our firm is best known for defending automobile manufacturers, our lawyers counsel an array of Global 500 clients in high-stakes, national litigation in a range of industries.

Product Liability Litigation

Broken link in a chain

Bowman and Brooke has defended thousands of wrongful death, catastrophic personal injury and other product liability claims brought against motor vehicle, chemical, construction, drug and medical device, heavy equipment and recreational equipment manufacturers. Day in and day out, we challenge well-financed plaintiff attorneys in locales unfriendly to business interests across the country. Through intensive preparation, creative presentation and persuasion, we become your advocates in both the courtroom and at the bargaining table.

                       

Bowman and Brooke possesses a dedicated product liability defense firm, fielding a deep trial bench. The firm is widely considered a market leader in the automotive industry, with a client list that features numerous leading manufacturers. Its broad practice also includes strength in areas such as medical devices and consumer products alongside activity in large-scale consumer class actions.

—Chambers USA, 2024

                 

We tailor our advocacy to your needs. Our legal teams develop a personal knowledge and appreciation of your organization’s business and culture as well as your product design, testing and quality control procedures. We develop a deep understanding of the technical and scientific principles applicable to your products. We field a team of trial lawyers, paralegals, investigators and experts devoted to your case from start to finish. We individualize our communication with you, the in-house lawyers and engineers who provide critical perspectives, experiences and skills to the defense team.

CASE RESULTS DEPEND UPON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO EACH CASE. CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE CASE.
  • Nov 22, 2022
    Lake Charles, LA

    On November 22, 2022, after eight days of trial and 30 minutes of deliberations, a federal jury in Lake Charles, Louisiana agreed that Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. was not responsible for a boat explosion and fire that injured three men. The consolidated case, styled Gonzalez v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. was venued in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana located in Lake Charles, Louisiana.  

  • Oct 07, 2022
    Reno, NV

    A Washoe Nevada County jury found Caterpillar, Inc. and its loader vehicle were not responsible for the death of a miner. The case  involved a 2009 Load-Haul-Dump (LHD) designed and manufactured by Caterpillar, that rolled over a miner when he failed to secure the LHD by setting the parking brake and other means, which resulted in his death. 

  • Mar 29, 2022
    Montgomery, AL
    On March, 29, 2022, an Alabama jury unanimously agreed that Husqvarna and its riding mower were not responsible in the death of a lawncare maintenance worker. The case, Easterwood v Husqvarna Professional Products, Inc., involved the overturn of a zero-turn radius (ZTR) mower down an embankment at a vacation resort that resulted in the death of the worker.
  • Mar 01, 2020
    Riverside, CA

    In a California trial involving allegations that a 2014 Ford Focus was a lemon and that Ford Motor Company concealed material facts from plaintiffs, Riverside County Superior Court Judge Carolyn Greene entered an Order on September 24, 2020 awarding Ford $97,186.27 in costs from plaintiffs.  Much of the costs awarded were expert and travel costs.   The Court ruled that Ford was entitled to recover its outside expert fees because plaintiffs had declined a CCP 998 Offer from Ford.  The case is titled Leonila V. Ambriz and Erick Ambriz v. Ford Motor Company, Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC1612390.  A defense verdict had been rendered on March 11, 2020 after 10 days of trial and 1 hour and 15 minutes of deliberations.    

  • Jan 23, 2020
    Pontiac, MI
    As a national product liability firm to Ford Motor Company, Bowman and Brooke served as Lead Trial Counsel in Kokeny v. Ford. Following two weeks of trial, an Oakland County Circuit Court jury returned a unanimous defense verdict – no cause on January 23, 2020, in this alleged design and manufacturing defect case.
  • January 2, 2025
    Legal Alert

    On January 2, 2025, a New Jersey appellate court released a landmark decision in Richard T. Berkoski v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. holding that an otherwise safe vehicle could not be considered defective merely because it did not have certain driver-assistance technologies. Plaintiff had appealed the trial court’s earlier summary judgment ruling in favor of Honda, in which the court agreed the manufacturer had no duty to equip a vehicle with every possible technology or to design a vehicle that was accident-proof. The absence of advanced driver assistance technologies simply does not render the vehicle defective because the ordinary consumer is well aware of the need to control her vehicle and of the potentially fatal consequences from not doing so. 

  • January 2, 2025
    Legal Alert

    In recent years, the number of lemon law cases filed in California under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act has surged—from about 15,000 in 2022 to over 22,000 in 2023 and more than 25,000 in 2024—placing a strain on the court system and delaying case resolutions. To address these issues, Assembly Bill 1755 (“AB 1755”), enacted on September 29, 2024, aims to streamline the lemon law process. Effective in two phases—beginning on January 1 and April 1, 2025—AB 1755 introduces new procedural guidelines, including the early exchange of discovery documents, expedited depositions and mandatory mediation all within six months after the answer is filed for those manufacturers who elect to be governed by the new procedures more commonly known as the “opt-in” requirement. 

  • January 1, 2025
    News
    Bowman and Brooke is pleased to announce the promotions of seven newly appointed attorneys to partner and five attorneys to senior counsel, effective January 1, 2025. These promotions reflect the firm's ongoing commitment to recognizing exceptional talent, dedication and leadership.
     
  • December 13, 2024
    Legal Alert

    Important amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure will come into effect on January 1, 2025. These amendments, aimed at ensuring the fair and timely resolution of cases through effective case management, will impact how civil litigation is conducted in Florida. 

  • October 17, 2022
    Events
    Bowman and Brooke Partners Travis Wheeler and Amanda Heitz are attending the PLAC Fall Conference in Park City, Utah. Travis, along with attorneys from Waymo and Zoox, Inc., two autonomous automobile manufacturers, will be covering “AI, Robotaxis, and Autonomy: What Lawsuits Are Coming Down The Road?

Integrated Services

In addition to providing stellar legal counsel, we integrate our provision of other key services with the work of our legal teams. The result? Highly effective and efficient client service.